<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad Demands&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/1006/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/1006?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ipad-demands</link>
	<description>Where my thoughts and your eyes (and now ears!) collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brady</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/1006/comment-page-1#comment-10618</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=1006#comment-10618</guid>
		<description>I could be snarky and write something like &quot;Actually prove to live up to the hype and be magical&quot; but that would be silly.

I didn&#039;t write that the iPad won&#039;t be successful.  In fact, I find it interesting that simply by questioning the demand patterns I am somehow challenging the success of this device.

First:  Success for the device in my mind is simple.  Is Apple profiting from selling the device.  And are the profits (in the near- to mid-term) increasing?  If they are profiting then it is obviously a success.  Businesses sell things to make a profit, and thus that is success.   I will even go so far as to say that, for at least the first 2 or 3 years, Apple will dominate the market for multi-touch large-screen keyboard-less media devices.

That said, I would like to point out that any time I have spoken &quot;against&quot; the iPad it wasn&#039;t ever to argue that the device won&#039;t be successful. I have always believed it would be.  I just challenge the notion that it is a) magical and b) will somehow &quot;change the world&quot; on its own.  I voiced my reasons for why I believe people (such as I) won&#039;t buy the device.  Multi-tasking (of the OS, not the user) being one example that I personally would want to have first.  Others want that user-facing camera.

Alas, for some reason pointing out why people won&#039;t buy a device is seen as &quot;hating&quot; on the device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be snarky and write something like &#8220;Actually prove to live up to the hype and be magical&#8221; but that would be silly.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t write that the iPad won&#8217;t be successful.  In fact, I find it interesting that simply by questioning the demand patterns I am somehow challenging the success of this device.</p>
<p>First:  Success for the device in my mind is simple.  Is Apple profiting from selling the device.  And are the profits (in the near- to mid-term) increasing?  If they are profiting then it is obviously a success.  Businesses sell things to make a profit, and thus that is success.   I will even go so far as to say that, for at least the first 2 or 3 years, Apple will dominate the market for multi-touch large-screen keyboard-less media devices.</p>
<p>That said, I would like to point out that any time I have spoken &#8220;against&#8221; the iPad it wasn&#8217;t ever to argue that the device won&#8217;t be successful. I have always believed it would be.  I just challenge the notion that it is a) magical and b) will somehow &#8220;change the world&#8221; on its own.  I voiced my reasons for why I believe people (such as I) won&#8217;t buy the device.  Multi-tasking (of the OS, not the user) being one example that I personally would want to have first.  Others want that user-facing camera.</p>
<p>Alas, for some reason pointing out why people won&#8217;t buy a device is seen as &#8220;hating&#8221; on the device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/1006/comment-page-1#comment-10615</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=1006#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>Steve, Prior to April 3, I&#039;d like your criteria for what would allow the iPad to be classified as a &quot;success&quot; in your eyes.  I believe it will be a success, and I think it&#039;s justifiably already considered a success in the eyes of many, just based on the pre-order volume.  If it&#039;s possible for it to be viewed as a success in your eyes, please state what it would take (# of units sold?  # of iBooks sold?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Prior to April 3, I&#8217;d like your criteria for what would allow the iPad to be classified as a &#8220;success&#8221; in your eyes.  I believe it will be a success, and I think it&#8217;s justifiably already considered a success in the eyes of many, just based on the pre-order volume.  If it&#8217;s possible for it to be viewed as a success in your eyes, please state what it would take (# of units sold?  # of iBooks sold?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

