Comments on: An interesting view of the “first 100 hours” http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/149?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-interesting-view-of-the-first-100-hours Where my thoughts and your eyes (and now ears!) collide Mon, 14 May 2012 20:59:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: FleshPresser http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/149/comment-page-1#comment-293 FleshPresser Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:13:34 +0000 http://sctoday.net/ProfessorNotes/wordpress/archives/149#comment-293 I just wish you would find something else to obsess about. You're right - I can't control you linking to my site, or talking about me, but I will state for the record that I'm beginning to find it creepy. I just wish you would find something else to obsess about. You’re right – I can’t control you linking to my site, or talking about me, but I will state for the record that I’m beginning to find it creepy.

]]> By: admin http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/149/comment-page-1#comment-292 admin Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:14:48 +0000 http://sctoday.net/ProfessorNotes/wordpress/archives/149#comment-292 Ahh yes. Perhaps that was actually why I provided a link to your site. For those that are most interested in reading about my being banned, I would point out that you can find that exchange under the discussion regarding Santa smoking something. It had something to do with the need for a legitimate debate in Congress concerning marijuana. And fleshy, while I appreciate your position that you can exercise editorial control over your blog, I would point out that I can also exercise that control over mine. Or are you suggesting that you now have editorial control over mine as well. I must say I honestly don't see what the problem is. I openly encourage my reader(s) to visit your blog and read for themselves what is going on. I have never referenced your blog without providing the web address or links (depending on whether it is the podcast, or the blog entry itself). And unlike Donald Trump I didn't think it was appropriate for me to post your private email as part of the blog. Are you now giving me permission to post your email to me, and my reply? Ahh yes. Perhaps that was actually why I provided a link to your site. For those that are most interested in reading about my being banned, I would point out that you can find that exchange under the discussion regarding Santa smoking something. It had something to do with the need for a legitimate debate in Congress concerning marijuana.

And fleshy, while I appreciate your position that you can exercise editorial control over your blog, I would point out that I can also exercise that control over mine. Or are you suggesting that you now have editorial control over mine as well.

I must say I honestly don’t see what the problem is. I openly encourage my reader(s) to visit your blog and read for themselves what is going on. I have never referenced your blog without providing the web address or links (depending on whether it is the podcast, or the blog entry itself).

And unlike Donald Trump I didn’t think it was appropriate for me to post your private email as part of the blog. Are you now giving me permission to post your email to me, and my reply?

]]> By: FleshPresser http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/149/comment-page-1#comment-291 FleshPresser Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:06:21 +0000 http://sctoday.net/ProfessorNotes/wordpress/archives/149#comment-291 And a "refined" sauce is far more appropriate for your readers than the TRUE rendering, which you would never allow. Go ahead... tell them the whole thing. If you're going to reference it, please reference the whole thing. If not, please leave me out of your posts. And a “refined” sauce is far more appropriate for your readers than the TRUE rendering, which you would never allow. Go ahead… tell them the whole thing. If you’re going to reference it, please reference the whole thing. If not, please leave me out of your posts.

]]>