<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging is Journalism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336</link>
	<description>Where my thoughts and your eyes (and now ears!) collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Thornton</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336/comment-page-1#comment-9763</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=336#comment-9763</guid>
		<description>My original post doesn&#039;t make sense for this post. I was a bit fired up from the Jessica DaSilva mess, and I misread yours a bit.,

So, here is my new one. The funny thing is that most &quot;real&quot; journalists as you mention don&#039;t have standards or ethics either (well we pretend to). Let&#039;s not forget all the scandals they have rocked mainstream media lately. Or how bloggers helped uncover some journalism scandals (Dan Rather anyone?)

It doesn&#039;t make sense to consider all bloggers journalists, is that many have no intention of being journalists. The original &quot;Web logs&quot; where just that -- online journals of people&#039;s lives. The vast majority of bloggers have no intention of ever being journalists.

But blogging is just a publishing platform. At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beatblogging.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beatblogging.org&lt;/a&gt; you&#039;ll find many examples of real journalists using blogging to cover their beats better (and other online, social networking tools).

Asking if blogging is journalism is like asking if desktop publishing is journalism. The answer is sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My original post doesn&#8217;t make sense for this post. I was a bit fired up from the Jessica DaSilva mess, and I misread yours a bit.,</p>
<p>So, here is my new one. The funny thing is that most &#8220;real&#8221; journalists as you mention don&#8217;t have standards or ethics either (well we pretend to). Let&#8217;s not forget all the scandals they have rocked mainstream media lately. Or how bloggers helped uncover some journalism scandals (Dan Rather anyone?)</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t make sense to consider all bloggers journalists, is that many have no intention of being journalists. The original &#8220;Web logs&#8221; where just that &#8212; online journals of people&#8217;s lives. The vast majority of bloggers have no intention of ever being journalists.</p>
<p>But blogging is just a publishing platform. At <a href="http://www.beatblogging.org" rel="nofollow">beatblogging.org</a> you&#8217;ll find many examples of real journalists using blogging to cover their beats better (and other online, social networking tools).</p>
<p>Asking if blogging is journalism is like asking if desktop publishing is journalism. The answer is sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Thornton</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336/comment-page-1#comment-9762</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=336#comment-9762</guid>
		<description>There are many bloggers who are amazing journalists. We&#039;re showcasing the best of them over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beatblogging.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BeatBlogging.Org&lt;/a&gt;.

Read some of my latest posts and listen to some of my latest interviews, and then come back and laugh about blogging.

It&#039;s just a publishing platform. Nothing more. Nothing less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many bloggers who are amazing journalists. We&#8217;re showcasing the best of them over at <a href="http://www.beatblogging.org" rel="nofollow">BeatBlogging.Org</a>.</p>
<p>Read some of my latest posts and listen to some of my latest interviews, and then come back and laugh about blogging.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a publishing platform. Nothing more. Nothing less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336/comment-page-1#comment-9760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=336#comment-9760</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interview in which Dan Gillmor speaks intelligently about whether bloggers are journalists:
 
http://blip.tv/file/1041166 
 
&quot;Some are. Most aren&#039;t.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interview in which Dan Gillmor speaks intelligently about whether bloggers are journalists:</p>
<p><a href="http://blip.tv/file/1041166" rel="nofollow">http://blip.tv/file/1041166</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;Some are. Most aren&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Gomes</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/336/comment-page-1#comment-9759</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=336#comment-9759</guid>
		<description>The problem with the whole &quot;Is blogging journalism&quot; non-debate is that it conflates a publishing mechanism with what someone does *with* that mechanism.

My answer to this question has always been &quot;It depends. Is the blogger operating journalistically, or using his or her blog for something else, such as self-expression, public diary, etc?&quot;

I then often follow with: &quot;If I owned a printing press, does that make me a journalist?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the whole &#8220;Is blogging journalism&#8221; non-debate is that it conflates a publishing mechanism with what someone does *with* that mechanism.</p>
<p>My answer to this question has always been &#8220;It depends. Is the blogger operating journalistically, or using his or her blog for something else, such as self-expression, public diary, etc?&#8221;</p>
<p>I then often follow with: &#8220;If I owned a printing press, does that make me a journalist?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
