<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can &#8220;Crowd Sourcing&#8221; be Fun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/574/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/574?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-crowd-sourcing-be-fun</link>
	<description>Where my thoughts and your eyes (and now ears!) collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Swartz</title>
		<link>http://theprofessornotes.com/archives/574/comment-page-1#comment-10027</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Swartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprofessornotes.com/?p=574#comment-10027</guid>
		<description>Steve:

Gtreat stuff actually.  And this coming from a self professed &quot;late adopter&quot; of any technology (love my G1 phone by the way).  Anyhow, two points from a &quot;technology curmudgeon&quot; on the related Twitter/Cult of the Amateur/YouTube etc. issues:

1.  I read a lot of history (esp U.S. pre/revolutionary war period).  I have been thinking for quite some time about the role of &quot;pamphleteers&quot; (Thomas Paine&#039;s &quot;Common Sense&quot; only the most notable example) in helping to coagulate the masses into a critical mass of &quot;BAMN&quot; sentiment.  Now, given the reduced attention span of most modern day NorteAmericanos (thanks PBS- NOT!), is Twitter the modern day equivalent of the media channel called &quot;pamphleteering&quot; of yore?  That sounds an awful lot like a &quot;Comapre and Contrast&quot; question for a Journalism midterm . . . 

2.  Ahhh . . . not-so-viral marketing!  Yeah, YouTube scams are oh so inevitable!  Cases of professional music producers making &quot;amateur music videos&quot; for their ingenue wannabes, etc. are now part of the whole &quot;internet culture.&quot;  Look, back when we were actually inventing the internet (ARPANet, actually) people used the medium for all kinds of scams (hey, is that Nigerian Prince out of hte country yet?  But I digress.  My Irish Lottery prize money should be coming soon . . .).

So

Back to the Future?

Look, people don&#039;t listen to me when I am physically speaking to them in person . . . why on earth would anyone pay more attention to my stream-of-consciousness-tweets?

the other steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:</p>
<p>Gtreat stuff actually.  And this coming from a self professed &#8220;late adopter&#8221; of any technology (love my G1 phone by the way).  Anyhow, two points from a &#8220;technology curmudgeon&#8221; on the related Twitter/Cult of the Amateur/YouTube etc. issues:</p>
<p>1.  I read a lot of history (esp U.S. pre/revolutionary war period).  I have been thinking for quite some time about the role of &#8220;pamphleteers&#8221; (Thomas Paine&#8217;s &#8220;Common Sense&#8221; only the most notable example) in helping to coagulate the masses into a critical mass of &#8220;BAMN&#8221; sentiment.  Now, given the reduced attention span of most modern day NorteAmericanos (thanks PBS- NOT!), is Twitter the modern day equivalent of the media channel called &#8220;pamphleteering&#8221; of yore?  That sounds an awful lot like a &#8220;Comapre and Contrast&#8221; question for a Journalism midterm . . . </p>
<p>2.  Ahhh . . . not-so-viral marketing!  Yeah, YouTube scams are oh so inevitable!  Cases of professional music producers making &#8220;amateur music videos&#8221; for their ingenue wannabes, etc. are now part of the whole &#8220;internet culture.&#8221;  Look, back when we were actually inventing the internet (ARPANet, actually) people used the medium for all kinds of scams (hey, is that Nigerian Prince out of hte country yet?  But I digress.  My Irish Lottery prize money should be coming soon . . .).</p>
<p>So</p>
<p>Back to the Future?</p>
<p>Look, people don&#8217;t listen to me when I am physically speaking to them in person . . . why on earth would anyone pay more attention to my stream-of-consciousness-tweets?</p>
<p>the other steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

