The Professor's Notes

Where my thoughts and your eyes (and now ears!) collide

Hat tip to my brother for point me to the link

Don’t miss the EXCITING news for winning prizes-including TWO TICKETS to Michigan at Penn State (Football).  Listen to Real Tech for Real People for how to win!

Engadget is reporting today that Samsung will finally be releasing the FroYo Android 2.2 update for their Galaxy S phones, including the Captivate for AT&T and the Fascinate for Verizon.  I hope this is the real deal.  We have had so many rumors floating around.

There are many new and interesting features in the 2.2 Android OS, including the new GMail application, and voice dialing (finally?), in addition to “built-in” tethering.

Fingers crossed…

Hardware Agnostic Smartphones?

Posted by Steve Brady On October - 18 - 20101 COMMENT

NOTE:  This blog post is based on a conversation we had about the future of smartphones on Real Tech for Real People, in episode 56 “The LT Episode”.  Give it a listen, and let us know what you think.

Since the start of the smartphone experience, the hardware and the operating system have been so tightly integrated that one is hard to distinguish from the other.  This started as far back as the Springboard Sprint phone hardware attachment for the Handspring Visor, and continues today with the Windows 7 phones, the iPhone and in reality the Android phone.  But what if the phones (hardware) and the soul of the phones, the mobile OS’s, could be separated?

As the Windows 7 phone rolls out we are once again introduced to a wide array of mobile phone models, names, and interfaces.  We have been seeing that with the Android, with several different Galaxy S phone from Samsung, as well as a variety of “Droid” branded Motorola phones with Verizon.  And of course, as mentioned in the NY Times recently, if you want to get the iOS on a phone, you have to get an iPhone.

But imagine a different world: Imagine a world where the hardware becomes separate from the OS.  Imagine if you could go into a cellphone store, and decide on the hardware you wanted, and then purchase (or just install in the case of the Android) an operating system?  It would seem we aren’t all that far away from this reality.  The processors in the Windows Phone 7 are the same as many of the Android phones.  The memory, displays, and cameras are all essentially commodities these days.  The only real difference is the cellular radios that are included in the phones, and that is network dependent, not OS dependent–three “flavors” for each OS and you are done.

Does this open up a whole new world, or just add to more confusion?

Would YOU want to be able to mix and match the OS with the hardware that you prefer?

Let me know your thoughts.


Real Tech for Real People Ep 53 — Obeying Moore’s Law

Posted by Steve Brady On September - 23 - 2010ADD COMMENTS
    This week Tony and I tackle the big issue:  Should broadband pricing obey the law?  Yes, some have argued that broadband pricing is in violation of the law–and we rip that idea apart.
    In addition, Tony shares his thoughts comparing his iPhone 4 to his newly purchased Samsung Captivate.  It’s Android vs iOS.  Certainly a don’t miss episode!
    ========================================

LISTENER QUESTION: Sgt Slade asks…

NEWS:
Amazon takes aim at iPad in the sun. Snarky?

HP Announces an Android Based Tablet (but it seems rather hamstrung)

Why isn’t the pricing of Broadband obeying Moore’s Law?” The article title is a bit OTT, but the bottom line is quite interesting: Since the buildout is nearly complete, they author(s) argue that the revenue now is almost “pure profit.” Should we expect prices to come down? Or are they displaying a common misperception of economics, assuming that there is a relationship between “cost” and “Price” (there isn’t.)

TIPS

Photo: Just for fun (or is it Phun?) you can get make an overlay to put on your (i)Phone to make it look like a camera. So now, it really CAN be a camera! (or just go to step 7 and download one…) http://content.photojojo.com/diy/make-your-phone-look-like-a-camera/

PICKS:

Steve: TuneIn Radio for the Android
Tony:  TWIT for iPad

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

AT&T Unveils their “Incentives”

Posted by Steve Brady On June - 7 - 2010ADD COMMENTS
This article in the NY Times continues the hand-wringing concerning the new AT&T data plans.  For those that haven’t heard, AT&T is doing away with the “unlimited” data plans on the iPhone and the iPad (within months of the fanfare lauding the “true unlimited” nature of the iPad data plans.  But I won’t call THAT a bait and switch.)
This does seem to be AT&T’s solution to the complaints we heard back in December.  In December, the CEO complained that users were consuming data and they were going to “provide incentives” for users to consume less.  While this does seem to address the issue of consumption it is unclear what message they are trying to send.
That said, it does dance around the answer to the question I had a while back.  Back in December I wrote that the only way to incentivize consumers to “consume less” of anything was to make it more costly. 1  In this case AT&T has lowered the rates charged, (from a fixed $30/month unlimited plan, to $15 and $25 per month plans with data caps and additional fees for exceeding the caps.)
So, AT&T has provided incentives for users to consume less–get a lower costing plan, and watch how much data you consume.  Okay–this has the effect of reducing your actual cost while increasing the cost per unit, if you use the full amount of data allotted (and had previously used more than that.)
So will this achieve AT&T’s goal to reduce bandwidth/data consumption?  Apparently not.  To help customers make the transition, AT&T has argued that they have set the limits to levels that will only impact 2% of their users.  Specifically, AT&T has stated that 2/3 (66%) of their users consume less that the lowest tier of 256MB of data, and 98% of their consumers use less that the new “high end” cap of 2 GB. 2
Their point? Don’t worry–we are going to save you money, and not impact your use.
So they are arguing it won’t impinge on their users’ consumption, and yet they had as a stated goal a few months ago the desire to get users to consume less.
Double-speak?
  1.  Note, that more costly doesn’t have to mean more dollars. It can mean explaining the other “costs” of cell phone and data use–essentially scaring people away with cancer concerns, or concerns about data consumption while driving, and so forth.
  2.  Given that they are going to grandfather in those with the $30 unlimited plans, I can’t imagine anyone who knows they are consuming more than 2GB switching–unless they just have no idea how much they are consuming.  AT&T wouldn’t mislead their customers into switching, and then hit them with the higher consumption fees later–would they?

NEXUS “Not Selling Well” — Really?

Posted by Steve Brady On March - 9 - 2010ADD COMMENTS

I caught in Twitter today a “retweet” from @MacsFuture where they said that the Nexus 1 isn’t selling well. There was a link to the full comment on posterous, where the author writes:

I wanted to tackle this for a minute.1  I would have to agree that the NEXUS is not selling as well as, well, most other smart phones on the market right now, but on the other hand let’s balance the assessment by pointing out a couple things contained in the short post above.

1.  The forecast anticipates selling 1 million units by the end of 2010.   This is actually quite a  significant figure for a phone that really only works best (for now) with T-Mobile.

2.  The Nexus is only “sold directly by Google.”  In fact, let’s be more pointed with this: it’s only sold by Google, through an online purchase.  Imagine if the only way to get an iPhone was through the Apple Store site.  Would they still have sold millions? Yes, undoubtedly, but one cannot discount the tremendous boost Apple received by having their products in the hands of thousands of people nationwide, simultaneously.  Not to mention the tremendous press coverage of the “long lines waiting to get their hands on their first iPhone” that we saw in every news media market.

Now, a million units sold in 1 year is relatively trivial compared to the numbers of even the iPhone 1st generation phone.  That said, consider the deck that Google has elected to stack against itself.

T-Mobile is a good and worthy network, so I am told.  But more often than not, people talk about it as if it is the little sibling of the  ”big 3″ when people talk about their cell-carriers.  I think I can count on one hand (without resorting to binary)  the number of friends and colleagues that use T-Mobile.  Selling a million units for a phone that is, out of the box, tied to a company with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-Mobile_USA is “not too shabby.”  (This compares right now with AT&T having approximately 85 million wireless customers.)  Given the large numbers of people who are locked in to their existing contracts, I don’t see many people switching carriers, especially since they are not afforded the opportunity to “try before they buy.”  (See next point)

Additionally, the decision by Google to only sell the Nexus online, through their website, has to hamstring their sales.  I may like tech, but when it comes to dropping $500 or more on a phone (and/or getting a long term contract) I want to be able to touch it first, see how it feels and responds in my hands, and feel like I was an informed consumer when  I make  my decision.  I suspect I am not alone.  More than once I have driven past our local T-Mobile store thinking that, if only they had a Nexus in the store, I would stop and at least test the waters.  I suspect that, if I could go in to a T-Mobile and not only play with the phone a bit, but talk with them about the affordability of switching from AT&T to T-Mobile, I would make the switch.  And again, I suspect I am not alone.

Finally, early reports of lack-luster customer support by Google has most likely scared off a number of would-be consumers.  Take away the store front/salesperson access, and market your phone on a network that would require me to switch carriers, and I am going to want, nay expect, a rather significant online and “on phone” support structure.   Unfortunately, Google has grown a culture based around offering “free” and “Beta” services.  Expectations of support for “free” services are far lower than expectations when one spends a significant amount of cash.

And make no mistake–$500 is significant.

In the final (as of today) analysis, I would say that 1 million units sold is actually a remarkable number given that Google has left the confines of their “core competency” (which I will describe as creating free and innovative software-based experiences) and ventured in to the world of offering “for sale” hardware products.2  Additionally, they seem to be wanting to “play by the rules” of traditional retailing instead of breaking new ground in the cellphone industry (as was speculated prior to the offering of the Nexus).

What does the future really hold for the Nexus line?  It is now a waiting game, I suppose.  Imagine Google addressing even 1 of the issues above. An expansion to another network (such as a Verizon or AT&T) or even the opening of sales at T-Mobile stores could make a significant difference for the phone.  Or, perhaps they utimately will rewrite the rules for cell-phones, offering free phones to those that actively use Google services, extending the Ad Revenue model to a whole new domain.

Considering the mis-steps one can only conclude that the Nexus succeeds, despite itself.

  1.  Don’t worry, I am not going to tackle the whole “iPhone Killer” meme again.  It’s played out.  But remember, when people use that phrase more often than not they mean more than simply “give it a run for it’s money.”  They usually mean “drive to obscurity.” And rarely do we see a product enter and compete in an existing space and drive out a competitor
  2. True, Google has relied on HTC for the design and manufacturing of the Nexus leveraging their core competency, but they have not been a retailer.

UPDATE: I had to update the video, editing out someone who requested to not be included in the video.  There is no truth to the rumor that he (or she) is part of the witness protection program.

Matthew made the big decision today.  He went back and forth, considering a Droid from Verizon, or upgrading his iPhone to a 3Gs.  (If you follow @scmprofessor or @spreadhdgfx on twitter you know the questions we were asking.)

After much consideration, he decided on the 3Gs.  Part of the decision was based on the fact that AT&T agreed to waive the activation fee.  This was no small thing–Verizon was willing to wave it if we switched to them, so it made AT&T competitive.

We did learn one other interesting tidbit–AT&T will be getting their own Motorola Android-based phone, as well as their own rebranded HTC Hero (again, Android based.) later this year.  While waiting until March (or later) wasn’t going to meet Matt’s immediate need (remember his video about the damaged 1st Gen iPhone), this is good news for those of us leaving AT&T to get to a Droid.

(On the other hand, if the Droid is a viable alternative to the iPhone, so that you can leave AT&T, well, that’s a different story.)

AT & T to offer Incentives? Or is it punishment?

Posted by Steve Brady On December - 10 - 20091 COMMENT

I was struck yesterday by the word choice that was presented when AT&T’s executive announced that they are “considering incentives to get consumers to reduce their data usage.” (See the story “AT&T Considers incentives to curb heavy data usage“)

What sort of incentives could they be talking about? And why choose that word?

Well, the last point is obvious.  The definition of incentive (by most dictionaries) is to encourage or motivate to action.  These are all “positive” words.  Things that make us shake our head in the affirmative. “Ahhh… incentives. Nice.”

We usually see these as pay bonuses, time off, gifts.  Additional “things” that would encourage us to do a bit more.

Of course, that isn’t what AT&T is thinking.  In this case AT&T is going to try to come up with some way to get people (their customers) to stop using a service they provide–most likely the service offering that led them to AT&T and the iPhone in the first place! AT&T is looking to “consider new pricing models to curb users’ data usage as it tries to keep up with growing demand.”

What pricing model would “encourage” you to use less of something you currently consume and enjoy?  I think this is obvious–AT&T is going to charge you more.  So the incentive here is a negative one.  1

What is perhaps even more interesting is this (and I will leave you with this thought):  AT&T isn’t saying “We realize you like using our product and our product is in high demand and thus we will increase the price and generate greater profits for our shareholders.”  They are saying “We realize you like using our product, but we don’t want you to, so we are going to raise the price so that you stop using it.”

Tell ya what AT&T, when my contract runs out, how about I reduce my data consumption to zero.  The Droid sure is looking better every day!

  1.  I suppose I could be wrong.  AT&T could be preparing to offer rebates to people based on the percentage reduction in their data consumption month over month.  YEAHHHHH, right….

Featured Posts from the Archives

VIDEO

Enter the video embed code here. Remember to change the size to 320 x 270 in the embed code.

TAG CLOUD

  • Atom
  • About Me

    Many have asked, so let me tell you: I am a professor. BA, Political Science MPA (Master’s of Public Administration) MS Logistics Management PhD Business Administration (Business Logistics, supporting field Industrial Engineering) I have a strong professional interest in Collaborative Supply Chain Management, RFID in the Supply Chain (EPC), and Research Methods. I have a strong personal interest in political issues, and military affairs having retired from the US Air Force after 20 years.

    Twitter

      Photos

      flatironTwo FaithsThe sideEarly_AM_10_01_09_DSC01726_pregamma_1_fattal_alpha_0.1_beta_0.8_saturation_1_noiseredux_0on_Lake_10_01_09_DSC01731_pregamma_1_fattal_alpha_0.1_beta_0.8_saturation_1_noiseredux_0Andraka House 10_01_09_DSC01727_pregamma_1_fattal_alpha_0.1_beta_0.8_saturation_1_noiseredux_0At the bottom of the Grand Canyon of the EastTMI HDR v1